Are 15-minute homecare visits always bad?

Shorter visits can have a place within a wider care package

Why 15-minute homecare visits should be bannedShr

  • Guardian Professional,
‘Service users often wish to know what time people are going to turn up and for how long they will stay.’

Local authority commissioners often face criticism for the regimented way they purchase care and particularly for the hourly rates they offer. Interested observers will talk about the need to purchase care around outcomes, rather than the seemingly outdated method of paying by the hour, half hour or 15 minutes. In reality this is a bit of a holy grail as very few local authorities have mastered the art of outcome-based commissioning. This is made more difficult by the fact that service users often wish to know what time people are going to turn up and for how long they will stay. There is also the small matter of deciding how to pay for such arrangements.

Amid the concern about how local authorities deal with homecare issues the subject of 15-minute care visits has led to an outpouring of criticism. Last year’s report from Leonard Cheshire led to substantial publicity and the almost universal view that 15-minute visits were an evil invented by local authorities to short change both service users and providers.

How can a local authority possibly defend such a practice? In North Yorkshire we were aware that 15-minute visits were a routine part of care packages. One issue that stood out was their inconsistent use, with some parts of the county having a much higher percentage of these visits. We therefore decided to look at the practice and try and come to some conclusions about its use.

The review didn’t take the form of a desktop exercise. As an assistant director I accompanied independent sector care workers on visits. These encompassed all timeframes and gave an opportunity for both users of services and care workers to talk to a senior manager about the care they received.

In addition, a working group was set up that included council staff and the organisations who provide care. An important part of this group’s work was to take into account service user views. A surprising early finding was that most parties agreed there is a role for 15-minute visits.

The key to people’s views and to the final guidance that was produced centred on what could be undertaken in 15 minutes; the main principle being that such a visit in isolation was not good. However, a 15-minute visit within a wider care package did allow some simple single tasks to be undertaken. The guidance outlines some key tasks that need to be provided within any visit, such as ensuring all necessary hygiene requirements are met, plus one personal care task. The latter includes a wide range of activities from emptying a catheter bag, safety or security checks, to preparing meals or drinks.

The key element is that this is taking place within a wider care package and the care worker will be known to the person. The visit builds on the other support provided.

In a follow up survey it was found that over 90% of people were satisfied with the guidance and issues. A further interesting aspect of our feedback was that because some service users have to pay for care, they were concerned when visits ran over the allocated time.

We are now looking to build both the guidance and the approach. A key element of our commissioning as we attempt to attain the goal of being outcome-based is to ensure the providers and service users talk about how their care will be provided. If within the overall constraints of the care package they wish to make changes, then this will be allowed.

So should 15-minute visits ever occur? The answer in North Yorkshire is clearly yes.

Should 15-minute visits exist outside of a larger care package? The answer is probably not.

However, our approach is to talk directly to service users about how their care should be provided. If they do feel that one off 15 minutes meet their needs the answer becomes – why not?

The guidance is available here

Why not join our community? Becoming a member of the Guardian Social Care Network means you get sent weekly email updates on policy and best practice in the sector, as well as exclusive offers. You can sign up – for free – online here.

http://www.theguardian.com/social-care-network/

 

2 Responses to Are 15-minute homecare visits always bad?

  1. frank tetto says:

    I believe for paid caregivers, the 15 minute care visits does not work. This is especially true if the person requiring assistance is not able to protect himself / herself from both medical emergencies, environmental emergencies, Fire, Flood, Water damage etc. In addition if the person is not able to perforem his or own hygiene and needs assistance with bathroom breaks, cooking,eating, clean up, getting dressed, brushing teeth etc.
    In addition to the need to monitor the individual for safety, assist or complete household chores, and personal hygiene, the 15 minute visits fails to realize an important part of caregiving is building a relationship, social interaction, recreation, learning new skills, continuity, and in some cases even companionship/friendship.
    From an economic perspective the cost of travel in time and dollars for a 15 minute care visit would make it not worth a paid caregivers time. The result a service would be offered but care recipients would not be able to access needed assistance because few if any workers would apply or accept a 15 minute assignment. It simply is not worth the hassle to the potential employee and would result in little benefit to the care recipient.
    If you are speaking of non paid caregivers, family, friends, neighbors, even a simple phone call of less than 15 minutes would be of benefit.
    The only other group I could see participating in 15 minute caregiving is government agencies and agencies funded by government, whom I firmly believe have very little understanding of the challenges faced by people with disabilities, their families and the low paid staff they rely on to simply survive. The goal in services to people with disabilities should not be to provide only the basic needs of an individual but to assist the individual increase his/her independence, pursue personal dreams, participate in community events, enjoy recreational activities not just in the home but in theaters, sports stadiums, and arts centers.

    MCCT

  2. Sharon Joy says:

    I need care just to roll over in bed so have 24 hour caregivers, and have had 15 minute nurses, physical therapists, occupational therapists, etc. I dismissed them because they weren’t worth my time except for The one who actually taught me something useful
    above all I don’t need anyone who is afraid to touch me. Time is not the issue, nor has a blood pressure check ever helped me, the pain of one causes higher blood pressure, spasms and other problems.
    What we really need is personal assistance, not more tests or medications that make us feel worse. Quality of life matters. Advice we can obtain over the phone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

css.php